[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] [consensus][due: 2016-

From: André Silva
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 04:00:56 -0300

On 06/16/2016 01:27 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 12:59 AM, André Silva wrote:
>> On 06/16/2016 12:35 AM, André Silva wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2016 12:02 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>>>> I'd rather have it worded as
>>>>>     Parabola's community is democratic in its essence and adhocratic
>>>>>     it its form,
>>> +1 I agree since english is not my native language (i'm brazilian) :P
>>>> I'm not a huge fan of linking to Wikipedia, but it's not a big deal.
>>> Maybe for consensus democracy we could use references such as
>>> consensualdemocracy website [0]
>>> Otherwise, about Adhocracy, there is book called "Adhocracy" by Robert
>>> H. Waterman, Jr. It could be useful as reference, however i'm looking
>>> for another sources about it.
>>> [0]
>> I found it as reference for Adhocracy [0]. I'm reading it now to check
>> if it is useful as reference.
>> [0]
> I am coming to the conclusion that we should create both articles
> (consensus democracy) and (adhocracy) from our own wiki [0]. We could
> use those references as inspiration (eg. Wikipedia articles) to begin
> our version. What do you think?
> [0]

I've created articles about Consensus democracy [0] and Adhocracy [1] in
our wiki to be used in clause 4. Those articles are based on Wikipedia
articles ones. Maybe it need more expansion and modifications, but it is
a good way to avoid use linking to Wikipedia. What do you think guys?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]