[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certif
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certification)
Tue, 09 Aug 2016 09:34:36 -0700
KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.14-gnu; KDE/4.14.21; x86_64; ; )
Sounds good, we'll purge
On Tuesday, August 09, 2016 12:07:33 Henry Jensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:15:51PM -0700, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
> > > I have hard time figuring out the license for these:
> > >
> > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> > > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> > >
> > > No-mod clause is present in these:
> > >
> > > font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> > > font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> > You're right about font-bh-typewrityper and I removed it from the
> > ConnochaetOS' repo.
> I meant font-bh-type1 ...
> > But am am not sure about font-bh-ludicatypewriter. Gentoo claims this
> > fonts
> > are "public domain" 
> > Furthermore Trisquel (and Debian) have this fonts included as part of
> > their xfonts-100dpi and xfonts-75dpi package. So I think it is okay to
> > keep
> > them until someone have seriously doubts.
> > 
> > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter
> > -100dpi
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.