[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF

From: Ivan Zaigralin
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:17:14 -0700
User-agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.172-gnu; KDE/4.14.32; x86_64; ; )

What you are saying below was also my understanding, Bill, up to very 
recently, because this email from Childebert <address@hidden> , who 
inquired about our status from FSF just a few days ago, seems to offer a 
contradictory assertion:

> Subject: reply FSF
> Date: Thursday, June 20, 2019, 18:36:31
> From: Childebert <address@hidden>
> To: Ivan Zaigralin <address@hidden>
> CC: Matt Samudio <address@hidden>
> Le Thu, 20 Jun 2019 08:21:01 -0700,
> Ivan Zaigralin <address@hidden> a écrit :
> I received the message from the FSF he say this :"With Freenix, a year
> ago an issue was raised on gnu-linux-libre@ that remained unresolved
> there,

Perhaps this is all a result of miscommunication, but either way, FSF's 
official position in this process is one of the things I am trying to 
understand right now.

On Friday, June 21, 2019 17:03:58 bill-auger wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:08:44 -0700 Ivan wrote:
> > Once again, please let us know if there's anything there you
> > see that is in violation of FSDG.
> i think this distro is entirely in the FSF's hands now - shortly
> after the new evaluation procedure was put into place, donald
> immediately moved freenix and libretybsd out of the section:
> "Distros that have requested consideration", and into the
> section: "Distros ready for final review by the FSF", bypassing
> the section: "Distros currently being evaluated by the community"
> &oldid=48254
> as i remember that was because those two distros were considered
> to be already fully evaluated by the community, and would not
> need to go through the new review checklist process; but would
> be immediately eligible for consideration by the FSF
> at this point, if someone from the community found an issue with
> freenix, probably the freenix bug tracker would be the most
> appropriate place to report it - there is probably nothing more
> to discuss on this list, unless it turns out to be some unclear
> edge case that requires discussion, clarification, or consensus
> in order to determine of it is a FSDG problem

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]