Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters

[Bernd Jendrissek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <5f063e31.0405050917.64dcd9c2@posting.google.com>
Snuffelluffogus <darkred@myway.com> wrote:
>> Oh, no, it's just the "patriotic" MS-aka-BSA DMCA police.
>
>It's been theorized for several years now that Microsoft
>will ultimately become a Linux supporter. And I recall
>seeing a job ad about 2 years ago for a new company
>in Redmond involved with Linux. And then there are
>the periodic hints from Dvorak, who presumably believes
>what he does because at least some industry insiders
>also believe the same.

So?  Microsoft heavily funded Transvirtual Technologies, which was
behind the development of Kaffe.  What difference does it make?  The
software is still free, regardless of who created it.

What makes you think the free software movement isn't close to *victory*
by *making* Microsoft et al adapt to freedom or die?

- -- 
http://voyager.abite.co.za/~berndj/ (f1084a555d2098411cff4cefd41d2e2a1c85d18c)
I have neither the need, the time, or the inclination to put words into your
mouth. You are perfectly capable of damaging your reputation without any help
from me.                   --Richard Heathfield roasts a troll in comp.lang.c
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQFAmTAV/FmLrNfLpjMRAs+WAJ9ZWgEP/ZMJ9vl55Tknk5chRX5r2ACcCa8z
e1pQfRToAGLl6qobvaDd/38=
=DKUY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----