[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how much is too much?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: how much is too much? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 May 2005 12:41:30 +0200 |
Isaac wrote:
[...]
> 17 USC 117 covers modifications required to run programs when one
ones a copy. IMO that would include linking code to a library,
I don't think so. Think of a "package" in source code - a tarball of
linked (some modules reference others modules) components. What does
it have to do with 17 USC 117 as far as preparation and distribution
of that "package" is concerned? Nothing, I think.
And a single "executable" is just another (binary) form.
> but might not cover rewriting the library to add new functionality.
Agreed.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: how much is too much?, (continued)
- Re: how much is too much?, John Hasler, 2005/05/25
- Re: how much is too much?, Isaac, 2005/05/26
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, John Hasler, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Isaac, 2005/05/30
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Isaac, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/05/31
- Re: how much is too much?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/31