[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD)
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD) |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:09:46 +0200 |
Bruce Lewis wrote:
[...]
> intend to. I'm only refuting the assertion that if no lines of program
> code are modified, it necessarily follows that there is no derivative
> work.
It's not a derivative work if it's a (non-derivative) compilation. You
just can't have it both ways (derivative compilations based on some other
preexisting compilation(s) aside for a moment). Hey, even RMS admitted it
twice: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00390.html>.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, (continued)
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Isaac, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/16
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Isaac, 2005/08/17
- derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD), Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/18
- Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD), Isaac, 2005/08/18
- Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD), Bruce Lewis, 2005/08/19
- Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD),
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/19
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, David Kastrup, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Isaac, 2005/08/05
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, David Kastrup, 2005/08/06
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Isaac, 2005/08/06
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/06
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/06
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, David Kastrup, 2005/08/07
- Re: Licensing question about the BSD, Alexander Terekhov, 2005/08/08