[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:10:50 +0100 |
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote:
[...]
> So copying at the function level is compilation, not derivation.
Copying at any level of abstraction as "black box" without any
modifications or transformations of protected expression in original
literary work (or part thereof) modulo the AFC test, and assembling
multiple works in "a whole" is compilation, not derivation.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/09
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: GPL and other licences, Bernd Jendrissek, 2006/02/10
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/10
- Re: GPL and other licences, Bernd Jendrissek, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Bernd Jendrissek, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13