[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Isaac |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:22:42 -0600 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:03:02 +0100, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > What breach? Distribution of authorized copies fall under first
>>> > sale.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there has been no unconditional authorization. So we are
>>> talking about distribution of unauthorized copies.
>>
>> The act of distribution doesn't turn authorized copies into
>> unauthorized copies. The act of distribution is totally irrelevant
>> RE determination whether a copy is authorized or not. So once again,
>> what breach?
>
> Conditional authorization does not magically turn into unconditional
> authorization.
>
> It's one of your favorite mistakes.
It's not a mistake. Preaching the gospel of first sale according to Alexander
appears to be a life mission.
Isaac
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Isaac <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/12
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/16