gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine


From: Linønut
Subject: Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:19:27 -0600
User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux)

After takin' a swig o' grog, David Kastrup belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> Linønut <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, address@hidden belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> (I am posting this on behalf of Richard Stallman, address@hidden, at his
>>> request. The "I" below is rms.)
>>
>> Sure it is.
>> And I'm Tony Blair.
>
> Actually, the thought "pearls before swine" hit me immediately upon
> reading Karl's article with Richard's comment.  And you corroborate
> it.  Perhaps you should check Karl's background before jumping to
> conclusions.

Why?  I didn't know Karl from Adam.

Nor would I expect RMS to answer, in any shape, form, or fashion, a
troll post from "Karen Hill".

And thanks for the insult.  It really makes your case.  How would you
like to be called a swine?  Hmm?

> Karl, as a general rule: answering to anything crossposted to
> comp.os.linux.advocacy is an utter waste of time.  That Usenet group
> has been completely claimed by trolls.

Not quite.  But it is good practise dealing with Windows Evangelists.

It is preferable to be skeptical, rather than credulous, on Usenet.

I think Karl should let RMS post his own responses to Usenet trolls,
should he wish to do so.

-- 
Q:  Why does a GNU/Linux user compile his kernel?
A:  Because he can.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]