gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:08:23 +0200

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> "IP" is not a legal term.  

Yeah.

http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/ms-vs-eu/article-20060421.en.html

<quote>

For one thing, "intellectual property" is not a legal term that exists, 
as such, anywhere in the world.

</quote>

How come that 

http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~tron/opensource/node5.html

says

<quote>

2.2 Intellectual Property

Normally, looking at property we think of things like land, money, 
equipment, cars and other physical entities, but there is also another 
kind: intellectual property. This legal term is defined as ``intangible 
property that is the result of creativity, such as patents, copyrights, 
etc.'' [Oxford98, intellectual property] and grants individuals or 
groups certain control over valuable information.

</quote>

eh?

regards,
alexander.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]