[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effectonderivativedistros"
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effectonderivativedistros" |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:02:54 +0200 |
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
[...]
> > That's not what I'm saying. You purchase 500 copies, not one. You
> > have a choice: 500 CDs in a box, or download-and-burn-yourself. You
> > choose the later. How many times are you going to download?
>
> If the ability to circumvent the GPL depends on first sale then
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jumping to stupid conclusions like GNUtians? I thought you can do
better, Eeckels. You didn't answer the question. I'll take it that
since you're not total idiot (from what I gather), you are going to
download only one copy in the "purchase" scenario above. Your
production of 500 CDs would fall within implied license created by
law.
> you must obtain identifiably separate copies. In the case of a sale,
> the receipt stating the number of copies should do. In the case of a
> free download, you should be able to prove that you downloaded the
Free as in what? The price doesn't matter. And free as in GNU Republic
is beside the point as long as I've done nothing to accept it. And
implied license doesn't count as acceptance. Suppose I downloaded it
from online shop of my friend. And even paid something.
[...]
> I, for one, will never ever consider doing business with you. You
> cannot be trusted to honour an agreement.
I feel sorry for you. Turn on your brain.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", (continued)
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", David Kastrup, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", David Kastrup, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", David Kastrup, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", David Kastrup, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect onderivativedistros", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect onderivativedistros", Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effectonderivativedistros",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effectonderivativedistros", Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/06/30
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/29
- Message not available
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/06/30
- Message not available
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Tim Smith, 2006/06/30
- Message not available
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivativedistros", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/29
- Message not available
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/06/29
- Message not available
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Tim Smith, 2006/06/29
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/28