[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5 |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 11:27:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>>
>> Ter, 2006-07-04 Ã s 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
>> > Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage,
>> > which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term
>> > suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !?
>> >
>> > A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an
>> > antitrust attorney),
>>
>> Alex, please let me understand your reasoning:
>>
>> Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or
>> Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official
>> in the Point of View of Law?
>
> Consider:
>
> http://www.denbar.org/group/index.cfm?category=1105&EntityID=DBA
>
> "...
> COURTESY AND CIVILITY
>
> 1. We will work together toward resolution of our cases by
> being reasonable.
>
> ...
> 6. We will scrupulously refrain from making misleading
> statements of law or fact, whether by omission, inference
> or implication."
>
> Moglens "license-not-a-contract" and
> http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/research-agenda.html not only
> violates the standards, it warrants disbarment. I'm for free speech
> and all that, but please... "Professor Of History and *GNU* Law" or
> something.
Both your delusions and obsessive compulsive behavior are not pretty.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Linonut, 2006/07/02
- Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/04
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05