[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:22:23 +0200 |
Alabama Petrofsky wrote:
[...]
> The existence of so many distributors of GPL software other than the
> three defendants named here also raises serious questions whether the
> injunction plaintiff seeks could be effective in preventing the use
> of the Linux operating system, as those not a party to this case would
> clearly not be bound by any such injunction.
It appears that defendants are beginning to realize that the [L]GPL
code base is going to stay in quasi public domain (penalty for IPR
misuse until misuse is purged) for quite some time, if not forever
(until IPR expiration and entrance into real public domain).
regards,
alexander.
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, John Hasler, 2006/07/24