[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is source ?
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: What is source ? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:09:10 +0100 |
Seg, 2006-08-14 às 11:15 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> It clearly misstates the copyright law (by ignoring 17 USC 109 and 117).
> But what it means apart from misstatement, is that the GPL acceptance
> is manifested by exercising exclusive rights granted under it.
There is only a "misstate" if your intention is to foil the copyright
license by trying to bypass it alledging other dubious things.
Judges won't fall for that kind of intent.
Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
- Re: What is source ?, (continued)
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/08/15
- Message not available
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14