[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU licenses
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: GNU licenses |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 21:56:34 +0200 (CEST) |
The GPL didn't infect, nor spoil the project. The person who included
code did (actually, he made a good thing, so one should say that he
spoiled it or infected it). The GNU GPL does not have a soul, mind or
can somehow act without a human.
- Re: GNU licenses, (continued)
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, David Kastrup, 2006/09/04
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Richard Tobin, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/05
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/06
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU licenses, mike4ty4, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/07
- Re: GNU licenses, John Hasler, 2006/09/07