[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
15 May 2007 13:13:35 GMT |
In article <4649AAC8.16E4BF28@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>> You can't relicense the work of others under any license you like,
>> period. Regardless how much or little you add to it.
>This begs a question, dear GNUtian dak. How come that Linux kernel "as
>a whole" (in GNU speak) isn't under the BSD (all other non-GPL'd works
>constituting Linux kernel project aside for a moment)?
Because you *can* relicense the work of others under any licence
that *they* like.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
- GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15