[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
15 May 2007 22:38:42 GMT |
In article <85zm453gjn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>Defined interfaces are not usually considered to create copyrightable
>entities as long as they don't contain sufficient creative content by
>themselves.
This is interesting, because as I understand it the FSF claims that if
I distribute code that only works with their libraries (because I use
their interfaces), then I must distribute my code under the GPL even
if I don't distribute their libraries.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/16
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/16
Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/15
Message not available
- Re: GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/16
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/16
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17