gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:53:45 +0100

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Arnoud Engelfriet <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
> >> punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on
> >> a business plan involving defrauding the customers and misappropriating
> >> copyrighted material.
> >
> > Sounds like Google?
> 
> So where do they plead for reduced punitive damages because they never
> intended to recompensate anybody in the first place?
> 
> > Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only
> > for myself
> 
> Probably better that you speak for nobody else.

Hands off Arnie, GNUtian dak!

Google is 100 percent felon under GNU Law (just like the latest SFLC's
targets Xterasys Corporation and High-Gain Antennas):

http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:14537
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:14540
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:14550

regards,
alexander.

--
"PlaintiffsÂ’ copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market 
value is impossible to assess"

                             -- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]