[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:26:23 +0100 (CET) |
> I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one
> doesn't call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard
> people refer to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them
> refer to it as BSD.
>
> Would be the first time I have heard it, and I have been mucking about
> with Mach for quite sometime now.
Perhaps current-day Mach users use different terminology, but in the
"old days" (late '80s, early '90s, which was when I had the most
exposure to the Mach community) people referred to their computer as
running "Mach"; the term "BSD" never came up unless they were explaining
the details of the implementation.
I'd consider myself part of the old-days, maybe not the early days,
but not current-day.
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Richard Tobin, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Message not available