[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "My dad is a pirate."
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: "My dad is a pirate." |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:13:23 +0100 |
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
[...]
> So, 70 years after death is "legally correct" whilst "20 years" wasn't?
> The government keep extending copyright wayyyyy beyond it's original
> purpose.
>
> So, the legal purpose of copyright is what now? Certainly not "to encourage
> creativity and scientific endeavour". Throttle it, maybe.
Note the date below (1855):
http://lysanderspooner.org/intellect/contents.htm
------
THE LAW OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;
OR
AN ESSAY ON THE RIGHT OF AUTHORS AND INVENTORS
TO A PERPETUAL PROPERTY IN THEIR IDEAS.
VOL. I.
BY LYSANDER SPOONER.
BOSTON:
PUBLISHED BY BELA MARSH,
15 FRANKLIN STREET.
1855.
CONTENTS OF VOLUME I
PART I:
NOTE
CHAPTER 1. THE LAW OF NATURE, RELATIVE TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
SECTION 1. The Right of Property in Ideas to be proved by Analogy.
SECTION 2. What is Wealth?
SECTION 3. What is Property?
SECTION 4. What is the Right of Property?
SECTION 5. What Things are Subjects of Properly?
SECTION 6. How is the Right of Property Acquired?
SECTION 7. What is the Foundation of the Right of Property?
SECTION 8. How is the Right of Properly Transferred?
SECTION 9. Conclusions from the preceding Principles.
CHAPTER II. OBJECTIONS ANSWERED
SECTION 1. Objection First
SECTION 2. Objection Second
SECTION 3. Objection Third
SECTION 4. Objection Fourth
SECTION 5. Objection Fifth
SECTION 6. Objection Sixth
SECTION 7. Objection Seventh
SECTION 8. Objection Eighth
SECTION 9. Objection Ninth
SECTION 10. Objection Tenth
SECTION 11. Objection Eleventh
SECTION 12. Objection Twelfth
SECTION 13. Objection Thirteenth
SECTION 14. Objection Fourteenth
SECTION 15. Objection Fifteenth
CHAPTER III. PERPETUITY AND DESCENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
SECTION 1. Perpetuity of Intellectual Property
SECTION 2. Descent of Intellectual Property
CHAPTER IV. THE SALE OF IDEAS
CHAPTER V. THE POLICY OF PERPETUITY IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
PART II:
CHAPTER VI. THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND RELATIVE TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
SECTION 1. What is the Common Law of England
SECTION 2. Why the Common Law Right of Property in Ideas has not been more
fully Acknowledged
SECTION 3. Review of the Case of Millar v. Taylor
SECTION 4. Review of the Case of Donaldson and another, vs. Becket and another
------
regards,
alexander.
--
"Notwithstanding Jacobsen's confused discussion of unilateral
contracts, bilateral contracts, implied licenses, "licenses to the
world" and "bare" licenses in his Appellant's Brief, the issue at hand
is fairly simple."
-- Brief of Appellees (CAFC 2008-1001).
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", (continued)
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Ignoramus23193, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Clyde Wrinkle, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", El Tux, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Banty, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", El Tux, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Billy Ray Balzak, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", spike1, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", El Tux, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Linonut, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", El Tux, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Banty, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", El Tux, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", El Tux, 2008/02/23
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Billy Ray Balzak, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", stan, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Linonut, 2008/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", Linonut, 2008/02/22
- Re: "My dad is a pirate.", spike1, 2008/02/22