Re: "News" Verizon calls SFLC bluff

[Alexander Terekhov]

peterwn wrote:
> 
> On Mar 18, 7:44 am, Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
> > OK, this one confuses me.  At first I thought there was no case against
> > Verizon because they were just distributing boxes that they got from the
> > other company.  But they were also hosting firmware downloads.  That's
> > copying, isn't it?  So doesn't that require Verizon to have permission
> > of the copyright holder?
> >
> 
> Agreed that SFLC could theoretically sue Verizon, but obviously after

http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/VOLUNTARY_DISMISSAL.pdf

*WITH PREJUDICE*

That means total defeat of SFLC/Plaintiffs.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://linuxtaliban.com/bilder.htm