[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code
From: |
Wolfgang Draxinger |
Subject: |
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:15:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.5 |
Sherman Pendley wrote:
> "Lorenzo Villari" <vlllnz@alice.it> writes:
>
>> I'm maybe wrong, but I was under the impression that for
>> Firefox they use gtk+, which is written in C...
>
> Gtk+ is indeed written in C, but it's object-oriented
And?!
Coding something in C doesn't mean you must abandon using OOP
methods. It just means, that things are going to be a bit more
verbose (i.e. you've to maintain everything yourself).
Wolfgang Draxinger
--
E-Mail address works, Jabber: hexarith@jabber.org, ICQ: 134682867
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, (continued)
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Richard Heathfield, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Willem, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, lawrence . jones, 2008/07/21
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Richard Heathfield, 2008/07/21
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Richard Harter, 2008/07/22
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Willem, 2008/07/21
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, peter koch, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Richard Heathfield, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Lorenzo Villari, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Sherman Pendley, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code,
Wolfgang Draxinger <=
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, David Kastrup, 2008/07/21
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Wolfgang Draxinger, 2008/07/21
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Lionel B, 2008/07/15
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Kenny McCormack, 2008/07/15
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Roberto Waltman, 2008/07/15
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, James Kanze, 2008/07/22