[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:45:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
I said *court* enforcement, Hyman.
Courts enforce things when the parties cannot come to
agreement on their own. So far that hasn't happened.
Well, except in the JMRI case, where the appeals court
said that the plaintiffs could go ahead with their
claims of copyright infringement.
> There was no court order to date (World Wide)
> enforcing the GPL, to my knowledge.
There are no world-wide courts, to my knowledge.
> When will the SFLC's GPL court enforcement come in
> existence?
When one of their defendants decides not to come into
voluntary compliance with the GPL.
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/06
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/07
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/09
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/09
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/09
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/09
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/09
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, David Kastrup, 2008/09/10
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/10
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Tim Smith, 2008/09/10
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, David Kastrup, 2008/09/10
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/10
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, David Kastrup, 2008/09/10