[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freedom. . . NOT
From: |
RonB |
Subject: |
Re: Freedom. . . NOT |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:00:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.4 |
Rjack wrote:
> "So over the weekend I began to think about the GPL and my general
> disdain for it. For a license that is touted as 'free', it certainly
> doesn't feel that way. As a libertarian, I've often found myself baffled
> by the leftist stance that freedom has to be enforced with overwhelming
> regulation, and to me, the GPL is one of the best examples of such
> repression. Its viral nature is neither business nor government
> friendly, and its proliferation places a great strain on a developer's
> ability to quickly and freely incorporate quality software into highly
> complex and disparate systems. . . "
>
> http://www.tbradford.org/2008/09/kinder-gentler-free-software-license.html
They incorporate and share -- why should that be a "viral nature." So what
is it the writer is advocating? Legal theft?
--
RonB
"There's a story there...somewhere"
- Freedom. . . NOT, Rjack, 2008/09/15
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT,
RonB <=
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, David Kastrup, 2008/09/16
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/16
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/16
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/17
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/17
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/17
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, David Kastrup, 2008/09/17
- Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/17
Re: Freedom. . . NOT, SomeBloke, 2008/09/16
Re: Freedom. . . NOT, Rjack, 2008/09/16