Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Are those works available to the general public to copy
> 
> Of what relevance is that? I simply pointed out that the
> presence of even widespread violation is no indication
> that the rules being violated are invalid.

Would you agree that violation of rules imposed by public law
institutions (statutory) can NOT be equated to violation of "rules"
promulgated by "private agreement" intended to "substantially oust
public law institutions", Hyman? 

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070630094005112

"private agreement can substantially oust public law institutions"

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)