Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > The voidable, preempted provision of the GPL is section
>  > 2(b)'s modify-and-distribute term. Please demonstrate
>  > where Microsoft has modified-and-distributed GPL licensed code.
>
> Please demonstrate where anyone has used your (incorrect)
> legal theories to openly and successfully violate the terms
> of the GPL.

There is no need. All GPL suits end in voluntary dismissal.
You need only say no to SFLC or FSF demands and you'll
receive a voluntary dismissal. The official court records --
the only records that count -- confirm this fact.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)