[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:02:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
amicus_curious wrote:
The district court then dismissed the injunction on the basis
> that the plaintiff had not shown that there was any non-monetary
> harm either and pointed to a Supreme Court opinion that has
> modified the Draconian terms of some of the previously held
copyright doctrines.
That "had not shown" is literal - the district court said that
the plaintiffs could refile their complaint and detail the
non-monetary harm.
For what it's worth, I think the district court did not properly
follow the appeals court decision. But we'll see what happens.
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Rjack, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Rjack, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Rjack, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, David Kastrup, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, amicus_curious, 2009/01/28
- Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy, David Kastrup, 2009/01/28