Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > Verizon has a voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE. Surely, the
> > SFLC isn't dumb enough to volunteer for a second ass-kicking.
>
> Another GPL opponent in this newsgroup helpfully posted a link to
>  
> <http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/06/verizon-ceo-doesnt-know-about.html>
I would never brag about being so insignificant that no one even
notices me. Being lower than whale shit, which settles on the bottom
of the ocean, is not something I would crow about Hymen.

> demonstrating that Verizon is not deliberately flouting the GPL.
>
> The SFLC does not need to do anything else in the Verizon case 
> because the company which manufactures the routers which Verizon 
> distributes complies properly with the GPL. A Verizon web page 
> contains a link to an "actiontec gateway" from which a firmware 
> upgrade may be obtained. The source to that firmware is on the 
> Actiontec page.


Sincerely,
Rjack :)