[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:37:48 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:17:47 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>> The point is that you've not demonstrated that the files are stored on
>> a verizon server yet proceed as if you have.
>>
> They are accessed via the Verizon webserver. What difference would it
> make if they were somehow linked behind the scenes to some server owned
> by another company. Do you seriously believe that is the case? It
> would be very unusual for Verizon to have back office direct connections
> to Actiontec.
I don't know whether it's the case or not, and neither do you.
-Thufir
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/02
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Thufir Hawat <=
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/02
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/03/02