[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:40:01 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
>Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> GPLv3 is clear as mud. ...
>It seems clear enough to me....
>A program which is written to use a library is not a derivative work
>of that library...
I did not find the phrase "derivative work" in the GPL v3 text. I found
it in v2, but you are discussing v3, are you not? If so, it would be
better to stick to the language in GPL v3.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, (continued)
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/23
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/20
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19