[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:04:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Rjack wrote:
Perhaps the definitions of "mere aggregation" and "combined work"
can be compared and contrasted.
In a "mere aggregation" separate files are placed on the same
storage medium. In a combined work, separate files are combined
into a single integrated work, typically represented as a single
file, where the so combined components function together.
> It sounds like blind men are describing an elephant. When
> describing a legal document, definitions are of great importance.
There is no confusion whatsoever, except among those who seek to
deliberately sow it.
- Is database schema covered by the GPL?, walterbyrd, 2009/03/25
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/24
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, walterbyrd, 2009/03/25
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
Re: Is database schema covered by the GPL?, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24