[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:09:19 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:55:28 -0400, amicus_curious wrote:
> Whatever they paid, they also agreed to change their GPL code to not
> infringe on the FAT patents. That is an acknowledgement that they
> consider the patents valid.
All it really indicates is that is was likely a term or result of the
settlement. The underlying reason for the settlement can only be
speculated.
-Thufir
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Tim Smith, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Tim Smith, 2009/04/01
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Rjack, 2009/04/01
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/01
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Thufir Hawat, 2009/04/04
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/04
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Thufir Hawat, 2009/04/06
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/06
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Sermo Malifer, 2009/04/06
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/06
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/04/06
- Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, amicus_curious, 2009/04/06
Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle, Sermo Malifer, 2009/04/06