Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

[Alan Mackenzie]

In gnu.misc.discuss Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
> [snip]
>> You're flat out lying Rahul. I never claimed that. You're a desperate,
>> despicable, deleterious desperado indeed. Your mother should wash your
>> mouth out with soap for claiming such things.

> [snip]

>> If true, such claims are irrelevant. Ad hominen attacks never address
>> issues raised in argument. Ad hominen attacks are a mark of
>> desperation denoting that you have no rational reply.
> [...]

> Did Rjack just admit that he himself has no rational arguments?

Indeed he did, probably without realising it.  Sometimes, you've just
got to laugh.  :-)

His usual trick is never to give a complete systematic account of his
thesis.  You never get more than, say, 25% of it in a single post, and
often that is so prolix as to be unreadable.  I doubt he's ever given
a systematic readable account of his idea in a post.

And if you ask him a reasonable pertinent question which he can't answer,
he responds with abuse instead.

His notion is pure sophistry.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).