Re: GPL traitor !

[Hadron]

Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> writes:

> In article <em5Ml.36994$i9.25373@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
>  Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@launchmodem.com> wrote:
>> In any case, it is obvious that GPL 2 was very understandable by many many
>> people (e.g. Linus Torvalds), and they believed it served their interests
>> best.
>
> I take it you've never read the threads on the kernel list over whether 
> or not binary drivers in the kernel violate GPL?  There are a fair 
> number of kernel developers (not to mention RMS and others from the FSF) 
> who think Linus does *not* understand GPL.

And now one of the cleverest programmers in the world understanding a
bit of the GPL is supposed to convince us that Liarmutt's assertion that
the GPL is "easy" is true.

Does Linosuck never tire of being made to look foolish? You can hear the
rusty chain as he back pedals once more to settle on his Master's lap.

-- 
In view of all the deadly computer viruses that have been spreading
lately, Weekend Update would like to remind you: when you link up to
another computer, you’re linking up to every computer that that
computer has ever linked up to. — Dennis Miller