Re: JMRI case -- Implementation of the Federal Circuit's Opinion

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > And that allegedly severed "legal relationship" being what
>  > exactly, to begin with?
> 
> The extra permissions granted to them by the copyright
> holder, above those allowed by copyright law.

And on basis of what law do you think that Appeelees are obliged to let
third parties know about those "extra permissions granted to them by the
copyright
holder, above those allowed by copyright law", Hyman?

> 
> > What makes you/SFLC think that those other "licensees" *never*
>  > become aware of their rights?
> 
> If ...

An "if" hypothetical is not evidence.

"The District Court found that the record contains no evidence of past
irreparable harm suffered by Jacobsen and the record contains no
evidence of any future threat. This finding is sound."

http://terekhov.de/2009-1221/AppelleeBrief.pdf

regards,
alexander.

P.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number

Hth, Hyman.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)