[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free software is dead.
From: |
Rick |
Subject: |
Re: Free software is dead. |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:13:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:04:13 +0000, Azz Pizz wrote:
> Rick <none@nomail.com> wrote in
> KKadnbabnZ7z-CLXnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@supernews.com:">news:KKadnbabnZ7z-CLXnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@supernews.com:
>
>
>> No, the intent is for the copyrights to remain in place.
>>
>>
> Isn't for a lot of people the waiver an additional reason to not make it
> public domain?
What?
--
Rick
- Re: Free software is dead., (continued)
Proprietory software is dead., 7, 2009/09/26
Message not available
- Re: Free software is dead., Rjack, 2009/09/26
- Re: Free software is dead., Rui Maciel, 2009/09/27
- Re: Free software is dead., Rjack, 2009/09/27
- Re: Free software is dead., Rick, 2009/09/27
- Re: Free software is dead., Rjack, 2009/09/27
- Re: Free software is dead., Snit, 2009/09/27
- Re: Free software is dead., Rjack, 2009/09/27
- Re: Free software is dead., Snit, 2009/09/27
Message not availableRe: Free software is dead.,
Rick <=
Message not availableRe: Free software is dead., Rick, 2009/09/27
Re: Free software is dead., Hyman Rosen, 2009/09/29