[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:26:55 +0200 |
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
> Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
>
> > Here's the point. If you are an owner of a computer program copyright,
> > and license someone else to make a copy of your work on a physical
> > medium that is owned by the licensee then "Notwithstanding the
> > provisions of section 106(3)" gives the licensee (the lawful owner) of
> > that copy of a computer program the right to dispose of that copy as
> > long is it a transfer of ownership but not by rental, lease, or lending.
>
> > It's the PHYSICAL MEDIUM and not the MESSENGER that counts!
>
> Yes. But is that transfer of ownership not still subject to the license
> conditions?
LOL.
Read 17 USC 109, silly.
See the words
"is entitled, without the authority of the copyright owner"
do you?
What does it mean to a brainwashed GNUtian like you, Alan?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, David Kastrup, 2009/10/13
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/13
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, Rjack, 2009/10/13
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/10/14
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, John Hasler, 2009/10/14
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, David Kastrup, 2009/10/14
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, John Hasler, 2009/10/14
- Re: Psystar/Apple/First sale on Groklaw, David Kastrup, 2009/10/14