Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/jun/10/busybox/bell-complaint.pdf
> >
> >> Which makes this case be a plain copyright-relevant-or-not case not
> >> involving the GPL.
> >
> > Why did SFLC attached the GPL to the complaint silly?
> 
> Because their assessment of the situation is different from that of
> Bell's.

LOL. Sure it is different. But that has nothing to do with your idiotic 
theory of ""Answer of Complaint" has to include one detail: whether 
the defendant has chosen to avail himself of the GPL as a license or 
not.  If he says "not", the GPL is not an issue in the case. And the 
defendant has a lousy stance explaining what he is doing with the 
software in the first case. If he says "yes, I use the GPL", he has 
a lousy stance explaining what he is doing ignoring the terms of the 
license."

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)