gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTa


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents MoglenTalk
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:43:22 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> Notice here that he says "a copyright owner" not "the copyright
> owner". 

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf

"20. Mr. Andersen is the author and developer of the BusyBox computer
program, and the owner of copyrights in that computer program, and the
owner of copyrights in that program, he is the author and developer of
the BusyBox computer program. BusyBox is a single computer program, it
is really a single computer program and Mr. Andersen is the author and
developer of the BusyBox computer program, and the owner of copyrights
in that computer program, and the owner of copyrights in that program,
he is the author and developer of the BusyBox computer program. BusyBox
is a single computer program, it is really a single computer program.
[repeat Moglen's Bullshit rap]

20. Mr. Andersen is the author and developer of the BusyBox computer
program, and the owner of copyrights in that computer program, and the
owner of copyrights in that program, he is the author and developer of
the BusyBox computer program. BusyBox is a single computer program, it
is really a single computer program and Mr. Andersen is the author and
developer of the BusyBox computer program, and the owner of copyrights
in that computer program, and the owner of copyrights in that program,
he is the author and developer of the BusyBox computer program. BusyBox
is a single computer program, it is really a single computer program.
[repeat Moglen's Bullshit rap]"

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf

Does Mr. Andersen plan to offer an insanity defence against the request
for justice by the defendants, you MORON Hyman?

regards,
alexander.

P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. "

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation"

Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]