[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL misappropriation
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: GPL misappropriation |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:44 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/22/2010 4:35 PM, RJack wrote:
No matter what you say or how many time you say it, BSD licensed code
remains under the BSD license and not the GPL license.
Derivative works of BSD-licensed code may be otherwise licensed.
Indeed, that's why anti-GPL cranks think it's a superior license.
Incorporate away DAK -- all you want -- still, BSD licensed code remains
under the BSD license and not the GPL license.
The creator of a derivative work may license his work in any way
he chooses, and the BSD license does not forbid that.
- Re: SFLC is SOL, (continued)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Message not available
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Hadron, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Peter Köhlmann, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, Moshe, 2010/05/04
- Re: GPL misappropriation, chrisv, 2010/05/04