[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC admits the fraud on the copyright office, and the court
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC admits the fraud on the copyright office, and the court |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:12:06 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 3/29/2010 6:32 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
"Plaintiffs deny the allegations of Paragraph 6 of Best Buy's
Counterclaims to the extent they assert that Mr. Andersen alleges he is
the author, developer and owner of “[all of] the” copyrights in BusyBox.
Plaintiffs admit that they allege that Mr. Andersen is the author and
owner of copyrights in portions of BusyBox. "
<http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane>
McFarlane’s registrations no more revealed an intent to claim
copyright in Gaiman’s contributions, as distinct from McFarlane’s
own contributions as compiler and illustrator, than the copyright
notices did. The significance of registration is that it is a
prerequisite to a suit to enforce a copyright.