[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compliance detection tool
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Compliance detection tool |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:16:48 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 4/16/2010 2:36 PM, RJack wrote:
Virtually all open source licenses are unenforceable due to lack of
Article III standing. Open source licenses in general are only
useful for defenses against copyright infringement suits.
That's false, as we can see from this court decision:
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
Having determined that the terms of the Artistic License
are enforceable copyright conditions, we remand to enable
the District Court to determine whether Jacobsen has
demonstrated (1) a likelihood of success on the merits and
either a presumption of irreparable harm or a demonstration
of irreparable harm; or (2) a fair chance of success on the
merits and a clear disparity in the relative hardships and
tipping in his favor.
- Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- The birth of a virus scanner against the GPL virus, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, amicus_curious, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Compliance detection tool, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04