[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Justice draws nigh
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Justice draws nigh |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:55:03 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 5/12/2010 11:58 AM, RJack wrote:
And automatically dismisses the suit rather than have a federal judge
review the GPL on the merits.
With no dispute, federal judges aren't going to review anything.
Agree with what? Imaginary settlements?
The defendants all provide the source code for the GPL-covered
works they distribute. Classifying actual source code as an
imaginary settlement seems like a symptom of wishful thinking.
- Re: Justice draws nigh, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Justice draws nigh, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Justice draws nigh, RJack, 2010/12/08