Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> ZnU wrote:
> [...]
>> indeed be copyright violation. He simply cited a case with little
>> similarity to a hypothetical GPL case, in which conditions were not
>> properly established.
>
> You seem to confuse conditions to the grant of rights and covenants in
> consideration of the rights granted.

[...]

> Recognizing that the existence of consensual licensing arrangements 
> significantly changes the applicable rules and the expectations of the 
> parties,

Where is a consensual licensing arrangement when the receiving party
never did anything to signal being interested in entering into such an
arrangement or heeding its conditions?

-- 
David Kastrup