[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?)
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?) |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:03:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 12:13:47PM +0100, Andreas wrote:
> This maintainers' lack of accountability
> (...)
> To truly implement such fundamental changes, it would perhaps be better
> to start drafting a solid charter
indeed, this is the implied idea behind "collectively decide about the
organization of the project". The "social contract" is a first step in that
direction, to establish accountability towards a common goal that is clearly
formulated and communicated to the public. I think this also answers Alfred's
question about the goal of the text.
Andreas
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Concrete suggestions on how to make GNU more welcoming (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/06
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Brandon Invergo, 2019/11/07
- Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Jean Louis, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?),
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/07
- Re: Enlightenment (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/07
- Do the proponents of GNU ‘Social contract’ value its paragraph about ‘harassment’ above the freedom-related ones? (was: A GNU “social contract”?), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/07
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/05
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/05