[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Carlos O'Donell |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:23:01 -0500 |
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:21 AM Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 12:44 PM Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 09:46:56PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > > Thanks, Andreas, for this new version! Some comments below.
> >
> > They are integrated into the attached new version. For good measure,
> > I have capitalised "GNU System" as you did and thrown in a few italics
> > as suggested.
>
> This looks great! +1 from me.
>
> I like that we have 4 straight forward items.
>
> Cognitively I might like 5 items. Humans tend to like 3, 5, or 7 items.
>
> You can count 5 on your hand.
>
> Some cultures really like 5 item lists. Some cultures dislike the
> number 4 and find it bad luck.
5. Reserved for future use!
Just put it into the contract and leave it for future use ;-)
Cheers,
Carlos.
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/12/10
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Carlos O'Donell <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/12
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andy Wingo, 2019/12/12
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/17
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/19
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/19
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/23
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/27