[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [address@hidden: What's GNU -- and what's not]

From: Carlo Wood
Subject: Re: [address@hidden: What's GNU -- and what's not]
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 22:56:00 +0100

This is try two... my previous mail did not come back,
so I looked at the archive of this mailing list and
also there it is missing. Then I compared the archive
with my the mails that I received on the mailinglist
(I never delete any mail) and it seems that archive
is selective in what it archives? Or am I wrong?

Anyway - here is what I replied before (this time leaving
out the quote):

==========begin of what is missing from archive===========
From: Carlo Wood <>
To: (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Subject: Re: [ What's GNU -- and what's not]
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:12:14 +0100
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:36:07 -0500 (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote:

> The GNU Project is sending this message to each GNU package 
> maintainer.
> You may have recently received an email asking you to review a
> document titled "GNU Social Contract" and then to endorse it or reject
> it.  It does not entirely accord with the GNU Project's views.  It was
> created by some GNU participants who are trying to push changes
> on the GNU Project.  

I stand by RMS for obvious reasons.
If he says this is a bad thing, then it is a bad thing.
Hence I reject it (actually, I just ignore it) and move
on to other things.

Have a good day,
Carlo Wood (author of countless GPL-ed things)

=====the rest of the quote is not repeated this time=====

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]