[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed

From: Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)
Subject: Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:50:44 -0800
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2

On 2020-02-22 19:38, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 20:48:43 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
On 2020-02-22 01:22, Andreas Enge wrote:
> And another ad-hominem attack. Can you substantiate the claim of us
> being
> powermongers?
"Enforcement", "Ban", "Correction", "Warning" ....
You are sick.

Could I kindly ask for this person to be put on moderation? I find it
difficult to interpret the last statement as anything but a gratuitous insult (following a message that was not even directed at them). Notice that there
is a pattern of overly aggressive messages by Kaz Kylheku.

I think we can handle this without having to resort to blocking a
person's messages.

Kaz, please avoid use of subjective terms like "powermonger" and focus

Everything you see here has passed moderation.

If you don't think I should be able to include quotes of someone
else's text that contains "powermonger", take it up with the moderator.

I think that is useful for communication within projects themselves.
I don't think that should be blindly followed in a self-defeating way
by remaining meek when the project is under attack.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]