[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Package format/management ramblingss
From: |
Barry deFreese |
Subject: |
Package format/management ramblingss |
Date: |
Fri, 07 May 2004 20:19:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 |
Hey folks.
After reading up a little bit on package managers/formats, etc. I
thuoght I would send some thoughts along to hopefully spur some dialog.
RPM:
Decent package format and management tools. GPL'd. Support for pgp
signatures, pre/post scripts, binary and source packages, and more.
Cons:
Can have dependency issues when using a myriad of repositories. And on
a personal note, I don't like Redhat.. :-)
Deb/dpkg:
Good package format and management tools. GPL'd. Pretty much supports
all that RPM does and then some.
Cons:
I'm sure Alfred will say that one Con is that it's Debian! :-) To some
point I agree. Though I personally am not anti-Debian, it would seem to
be counterproductive to have to maintain a /DEBIAN environment for conf
files, pre/post scripts etc on a non-Debian system. Another con may be
some of the complexities involved in creating packages.
Stow:
Lightweight, easy to use package management utilizing .tar.gz archives.
Also happens to be a GNU project.
Cons:
No good way to resolve dependencies. I don't like the relience on
Perl. No pre/post script support.
Thoughts:
I like the Stow structure. I think it is cool. I am even warming up
to Marco's idea of a stowfs/packagefs.. ;-) However, from a (l)user
perspective it may be too minimalistic. If we have to add stuff for
paths, dependency resolution, pre/post scripts, we may as well write a
new package format. Also, if I have to manually get the tarball,
extract it, "make" it, etc before packagefs does it's thing, what's the
point? Again, from a (l)user perspective, apt is a beautiful thing. As
a user, I just want to run a command that goes and gets the package and
it installs it for me. So maybe we make a new minimalist package format
with some nice front end tools but utilizing the stow methodology??
Thoughts, comments, flames???
--
Barry deFreese
Debian 3.0r1 "Woody"
GNU/Hurd
Registered Linux "Newbie" #302256 - Hurd H4XX0r wannabe
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving
to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe
trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is
winning." Rich Cook.
- Package format/management ramblingss,
Barry deFreese <=
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/05/08
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Barry deFreese, 2004/05/09
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Marco Gerards, 2004/05/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/05/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Barry deFreese, 2004/05/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/05/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Barry deFreese, 2004/05/10
- Re: Package format/management ramblingss, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/05/10