[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:20:42 +0800 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.3.2; emacs 26.1 |
Hi Jean!
Nowadays there're several mature ways for that purpose, that's why XmlAT
is not continued and published.
Here're some alternatives:
* SXML module in Guile.
* guile-json
* GNU Artanis (SXML/CSV/JSON, maybe adding protobuf next step)
I'm going to drop GNU XmlAT, and I may consider to replace with my new
project gLua which is a Lua transpiler implemented on Guile. But I
need some time to polish it first.
So please forget about GNU XmlAT anymore. ;-)
Best regards.
Jean Louis writes:
> On September 4, 2019 6:08:50 AM UTC, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering
>>obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project
>>to
>>GNU.
>>
>>Here's a brief reason.
>>XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate
>>presentation for multiple cases. And it can be output to other
>>formats. However, it's a bit outdated, because nowadays the industry
>>use
>>JSON for that case, and it works well.
>>
>>So we don't need GNU XmlAT anymore. I would polish my other projects
>>and
>>offer some to replact GNU XmlAT.
>
> Thanks Nala,
>
> There is no source for XmlAT anywhere published. I am using only Lisp and
> sometimes Scheme, such software could be of use in website revision systems,
> and also in conversion of HTML to SEXPR when one wish to provide structured
> document with backlinks with ability to finely grained link to specific
> paragraphs.
>
> But without sources of not even possible to try it out.
>
> Jean
--
GNU Powered it
GPL Protected it
GOD Blessed it
HFG - NalaGinrut
Fingerprint F53B 4C56 95B5 E4D5 6093 4324 8469 6772 846A 0058
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, (continued)
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jason Self, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/08
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/09/06
- Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/03
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Richard Stallman, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Nala Ginrut, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, Jean Louis, 2019/09/04
Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?, bendikker, 2019/09/05